2b or not 2b, That is the ?


By Kerrin Willis and Carolyn Gomes Vieira

English teachers have been teaching students how to decode language and literature in classrooms across the country for generations. If we are advanced, we also teach them how to decode visual forms of literature. In academia, we call this practice “unpacking the text”. But times are changing fast and there are now so many other forms of literary and visual stimuli that need unpacking or decoding. In a digital age, “decoding” and ultimately learning how to switch between codes are becoming increasingly important. In the late 90’s this term became popular when talking about teaching inner city kids how to switch between Ebonics or slang and Standard English. Today this can be translated to “text language,” “screen media,” and academic language. In the digital age, the task of teaching students how to decode has become a job for all teachers.

One code that today’s students are intimately familiar with is the so-called “text language” most often used in emails, texting and social networking sites. The point of text language is to get something across as quickly as possible, boiling words down to their most essential letters, such as u for you and srsly for seriously. In text language, the words are not fully present. They are simply a representation of larger words with deeper and more complex meanings. Likewise, the users of text language are not fully present either. Rather, they are often multi-taskers, devoting only a fragment of themselves to the communication they are attempting to achieve. The result is a facsimile of a relationship between people. This issue is discussed extensively in chapter six of Robert Waxler and Maureen Hall’s book Transforming Literacy. Without either the words exchanged or the individuals exchanging them being fully present, the resulting conversation cannot be deep or meaningful. Teaching students how to switch between superficial and academic language is vital to shifting from the impersonal electronic conversations to the full-bodied conversations we expect in the classroom.

Another code that students are familiar with, but not well versed in decoding, is “Screen Media” such as film, TV and internet. While students access these mediums on a daily basis, many are inept at analyzing them and ultimately decoding the messages that they are receiving. Students feel that watching the movie is the same as reading the book, and yet, most are disappointed when the movie ultimately falls short. That is when you can get them to read the book first. This practice of only watching the movie or worse, only understanding the movie version is very damaging to the student. For example, an implied sex scene is played out in detail on screen and other liberties are taken with the written word to make it more marketable to an audience, not to enhance understanding to the narrative. Usually the film version becomes the director or producer’s version of the story removing many details that could be used to form the student’s individual analysis. This becomes a problem because the students believe that there is a “right” answer in literature and we have to re-teach them to think independently. According to Waxler and Hall, although the use of film in the classroom can “enhance learning” and “often provide expansive dialogue in the classroom,” there is no substitution to reading a novel.

Because they are bombarded by the images on the screen, some have become handicapped in creating those images when reading a narrative. It is now the job of the teacher to re-teach the students how to visualize the words on the page and to decode the visuals on the screen. Also, students have come to believe that the internet is infallible, not realizing that everything on the internet needs to be critically evaluated. This leads to misconceptions and problems in decoding. First, because they believe that the internet holds all the answers and the ultimate short cut, they can become misinformed and by using shortcuts, they lack the comprehensive researching skills needed to complete most high-level assignments. Our job, as teachers, has become more difficult as we navigate through the different types of “screen media” and now have to teach a resistant population how to evaluate and use this type of media in academia. For example, the difference between a blog, an academic site, student-generated information and so on all have varying levels of validity, but because these are all searchable, students believe that they are all valid sources. Some teachers find teaching researching skills difficult because they aren’t as versed as the students in using the internet, in particular, and some are resistant in the idea that this is even part of their job, thus many only allow print as valid sources. But as we continue to go further into this digital world, we must change our view and learn how to teach the students how to use the screen culture in a meaningful way instead of being used by it.

That is not to say that text or media language does not have a valid use. A code that can be expressed and read quickly is valuable when one is trying to relay one-dimensional messages such as “b L8 4 dnr” or “r u coming?”. Texting, film and the internet are all effective ways to communicate in some instances. The problem arises when people attempt to use codes in situations where they are not appropriate, or properly decoded, such as academia. As high school English teachers, we often see students who are confused about what language is appropriate for academic use, and it is our job to provide them with the tools they need to recognize the difference between codes that they might use over the internet and with their friends, and codes that they should use to write and speak in the classroom. The classroom is a neighborhood in which students should be fully present physically, emotionally, intellectually, etc. Their language should reflect this presence, and be a vehicle through which they are able to express it. Teaching them how to code switch between standard or academic language, slang, text language, the visual image, is teaching them to be able to think independently and to evaluate evidence effectively. If they are unaware of the difference between formal and informal language, they will be unable to evaluate whether an internet source is valid or not, a film is an accurate portrayal of a narrative or even lead to problems in interpersonal relationships.

All codes are valid and helpful in their own arenas, and the better we are at learning to use them appropriately and switch between them, the better educated we will be.


Kerrin and Carolyn are both High School English teachers currently working on getting their initial licensure at UMass Dartmouth.  Kerrin can be reached by email here and Carolyn can be reached by email here.


5 thoughts on “2b or not 2b, That is the ?

  1. Kerrin and Carolyn: Your discussion here is filled with interesting ideas. I would agree that we need to learn how “to switch codes” (as you suggest) and that there are many new codes to learn in this context. One point you make is, for me, particularly important in this regard. Teachers (and others) need to help students exercise their ability to read by getting them to engage directly with literary language so the students can transform that language through their imagination. In other words, oversaturated with visual images, we have lost our ability to move deeply into the imaginative world of literary narrative. We cannot actively visualize through language (linguistic narrative) what these imaginative worlds offer. Instead we wait for the film or video to give us what we used to half-create through the gift of a talented writer.

  2. Kerrin and Carolyn: You guys did a great job on this! I agree that as teachers we are faced with the challenge of teaching our students, and even ourselves, how “to switch codes”. In the digital age that we live in, it is hard for our students to actually find meaning in anything that doesn’t have a screen. As teachers, we are going to have to work extra hard to try and inspire our students to look for those meanings without screens. As a future teacher, I am afraid of the challenges that is teaching correct research skills to students; however, I do believe that it can be done. It is examples like that that will force us to find a happy medium between the digital age we are in and the print age that we are trying to teach.

  3. Kerrin and Carolyn, as a high school English teacher who is currently reading Waxler and Hall’s book Transforming Literacy, I agree that many young people find it difficult to use the appropriate language for different tasks. They tend to leave out connecting words in composition writing, and they often have a hard time with sentence structure. They either use too many fragments or a long string of ideas in run-on sentences. I address this with them with every paper, and I am seeing some improvement in their comfort level with writing over time.

    Another common problem that I see students grappling with is research. Quite a few students believe that all information sources are made equal. (Of course, many of us used to believe that when using bulky reference books in libraries years ago. Then again, bound books printed by a publisher usually have more validity than your average website.) In my Freshman Composition class I am trying to teach my students how to distinguish between a valid, credible, and useful website and one that is not reliable for use as a source. I am finding that, as long as you point them in the right direction and teach them what to look for when judging the quality of a website, most of them get the hang of it after a little practice.

    This leads me to believe that, with a little extra patience and guidance on the part of the teacher, most students are receptive to learning what sources, language, and other communication practices are acceptable in varying situations. It’s true that online research and its own specialized “language” is not going to disappear. If anything, we, the teachers, are the ones who will have to adapt most to this new digital world. Even so, I agree it is crucially important to preserve more formal, academic language for scholarly pursuits, just as the same language does not prove effective to use when texting. If anything, we should be celebrating this resurgence of communications between people around the world. The art of letter writing may be a part of history, but people are still staying in touch in the modern way. Instead of bemoaning change, we could look at the positive aspects of technology. Just like any tool, it’s only as effective as the person who is using it. Therefore, let us teach our young people to wield their words effectively in every situation to the best of our ability.

  4. By the way, the above listed Anonymous blog post was written by me. I just hit “enter” before adding my name. So much for teaching computer literacy!

  5. Carolyn and Kerrin, thanks for the interesting post! As a college freshman I find it interesting to read a teacher’s point of view on this subject. I myself don’t use “text language” while texting, just because I’m afraid it will carry over to the writing that I do in other parts of my life. I see it happening with a lot of my peers; in more than one class I’ve witnessed teachers giving students oral reminders not to use “text language” in papers! I decided from an early age that I would try my best to keep the two separated, but I learned that it was a lot easier to not engage in “code language” at all than to participate in it only when it’s appropriate. For me it was all too simple to slip into using code all the time, unless I constantly checked myself. When I text people I try to use full words and sentences, and I even use punctuation! This isn’t to say that everyone should communicate the way that I do, but it certainly works for me. I also find that it’s nearly impossible to understand someone’s true feelings or intentions through text message, but using punctuation can make it a little more clear.

Leave a reply! Filling out your name, email, and website is optional.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s